Cookie Privacy Preferences
We utilize essential cookies to ensure our website operates effectively and remains secure. Additionally, we'd like to request your permission to use optional cookies. These are intended to enhance your browsing experience by offering personalized content, displaying advertisements that are relevant to you, and helping us to further refine our website.
Choose "Accept all cookies" to agree to the use of both essential and optional cookies. Alternatively, select "Let me see" to customize your preferences.
Privacy Preference Centre
Our website utilizes cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to present you with content tailored to your preferences on this device and browser. Below, you will find detailed information about the function of cookies, enabling you to make informed choices about which cookies you wish to accept. Please note that disabling certain cookies might impact your user experience on our site. It's important to remember that cookie preferences need to be set individually for each device and browser you use. Clearing your browser's cache may also remove your cookie settings. You have the freedom to modify your cookie preferences at any point in the future.
For a comprehensive understanding of our use of cookies, please refer to our complete cookies policy.
These cookies are needed for the website to work and for us to fulfil our contractual obligations. This means they can't be switched off. They enable essential functionality such as security, accessibility and live chat support. They also help us to detect and prevent fraud. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but it means some parts of the site won't work.
These cookies allow us to measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know how popular pages are, and to see how visitors move around the site. If you don't allow these cookies, we won't know when you've visited our site, and we won't be able to monitor its performance.
These cookies enable us to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we've added to our pages. If you don't allow these cookies, some or all of these services may not work properly.
These cookies collect information about your browsing habits to show you personalised adverts. They may be used to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They don't store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you don't allow these cookies, the adverts you see will be less relevant.
Shop By Type
Shop By Brand
Shop By Accessories
Shop By Roofing Kit
Shop By Calculator
Knowledge Hub
Shop By Type
Shop By Brand
Shop By Application
Shop By Type
Tablet
Mobile
Shop By Type
Shop By Brand
Shop By Accessories
Shop By Roofing Kit
Shop By Calculator
Knowledge Hub
Shop By Type
Shop By Brand
Shop By Application
Shop By Type
50 Years Experience
Spread the Cost
Recticel and Kingspan are two of the biggest insulation brands and share very similar product ranges. So, how do the products differ?
Generally speaking, Kingspan is seen as the more premium option compared to Recticel, offering superior thermal performance in cavity wall application due to its phenolic core. However, not all of Kingspan’s insulation products are made using a phenolic core, and instead have the same as Recticel and many other insulation brands - PIR, which makes the choice between both brands less clear-cut.
In this guide, we’ll break down everything you need to know about Recticel and Kingspan, comparing both brands' products based on the application they have been made for, so you can make a decision that’s right for you.
Recticel and Kingspan are two of the biggest insulation brands and share very similar product ranges. So, how do the products differ?
Generally speaking, Kingspan is seen as the more premium option compared to Recticel, offering superior thermal performance in cavity wall application due to its phenolic core.
However, not all of Kingspan’s insulation products are made using a phenolic core, and instead have the same as Recticel and many other insulation brands - PIR, which makes the choice between both brands less clear-cut.
In this guide, we’ll break down everything you need to know about Recticel and Kingspan, comparing both brands' products based on the application they have been made for, so you can make a decision that’s right for you.
We understand not everyone has the time to read an in-depth blog, so we’ve put together a brief overview below comparing Recticel and Kingspan side by side.
Recticel | Kingspan |
---|---|
✅ Slightly cheaper | ❌ Slightly more expensive |
✅ Good thermal performance (0.022 W/m·K) | ✅ Better thermal performance (up to 0.018 W/m·K) |
✅ Highly moisture-resistant | ✅ Highly moisture-resistant |
✅ Suitable for general use | ✅ Suitable for general use |
✅ Suitable range of boards for warm deck flat roofs | ✅ Suitable range of boards for warm deck flat roofs |
✅ PIR insulation | ✅ PIR & Phenolic insulation |
✅ Easy to install | ✅ Easy to install |
Criteria | Recitcel GP | Kingspan TP10/TW55/TF70 |
---|---|---|
Thermal Conductivity (λ-value) | 0.022 W/mK | 0.012 W/mK |
Material Composition | PIR foam core with low emissivity foil facings on both sides. | PIR foam core with low emissivity foil facings on both sides. |
Durability | Good - 120kPa compressive strength <50mm & 140kPa on 50mm to 160mm. | Higher - 140kPa at 10% compression. |
Cost | Slightly Cheaper | More expensive |
Application | Suitable for floors, pitched roofs, internal walls, ceiling and lofts. | TP10: Pitched roofs TW55: Timber & steel frame walls TF70: Floors |
Thickness | 25mm - 160mm | 20mm - 150mm |
Recticel and Kingspan both offer excellent multipurpose insulation options, notably sharing the same thermal conductivity and only really differing in available thickness and compressive strength.
Therefore, if you’re looking for the most cost-effective option with excellent all-round performance, Recticel GP is hard to beat. However, if you want slightly higher compressive strength, Kingspan TP10/TW55/TF70 will be more suitable.
Criteria | Recitcel Eurowall (PIR) | Kingspan Kooltherm K108 (Phenolic) |
---|---|---|
Thermal Conductivity (λ-value) | 0.022 W/mK | 0.019 W/mK |
Material Composition | PIR foam core with low-emissivity foil facings | Phenolic foam core with low-emissivity foil facings |
Moisture Resistance | Good (foil facings provide resistance) | Good (foil facings resist moisture ingress) |
Durability | Long-lasting rigid PIR board | Long-lasting, dimensionally stable rigid phenolic |
Installation | Straight-edge boards, easy to fit in cavity walls | Straight-edge boards, compact cavity-fit |
Thickness Range | 30 – 100 mm | 40 – 150 mm |
Board Size | 1200 × 450 mm | 1200 × 450 mm |
Cost | Cheaper | More expensive |
Both brands offer excellent insulation for partial-fill cavity walls; however, Kingspan, although slightly more expensive, provides greater thermal conductivity compared to Recticel due to its phenolic core.
Therefore, Kingspan K108 is more suitable if you have a tight cavity space and need to achieve a very low U-value with minimal thickness. However, if you’re on a tight budget, Recticel Eurowall delivers good value for money while providing long-lasting performance.
Criteria | Recitcel Eurowall+ (PIR) | Kingspan Kooltherm K106 (Phenolic) |
---|---|---|
Thermal Conductivity (λ-value) | 0.022 W/mK | 0.022 W/mK |
Material Composition | PIR foam core with low-emissivity foil facings | Phenolic foam core with water-tight fleece outer facing |
Moisture Resistance | Good (foil facings provide resistance) | Enhanced (water-tight fleece adds protection) |
Durability | Long-lasting rigid PIR board | Long-lasting rigid phenolic board |
Installation | Advanced tongue-and-groove boards for a close fit | Compact straight-edge boards for full-fill with residual cavity (10 mm residual cavity) |
Thickness Range | 90 – 140 mm | 90 & 115mm |
Board Size | 1190 x 450mm (installed dimensions, including tongue and groove joint) | 1200 × 450 mm |
Cost | Slightly cheaper | More expensive |
There are a few key differences between the brands when it comes to insulating full-fill cavity walls.
If you have a tight cavity space, need to achieve a low U-value, and want the reassurance of enhanced moisture resistance, Kingspan K106 will be the better option.
However, if you’re working with a tighter budget, Recticel Eurowall+ will be more suitable, offering a cost-effective, durable solution that still delivers reliable thermal performance for full-fill cavity wall applications.
As mentioned before, Recticel and Kingspan both offer suitable products for waterproofing systems.
Criteria | Powerdeck U | Kingspan TR24 |
---|---|---|
Application | Torch-on-Bitumen Applied Waterproofing Systems | Torch-on-Bitumen Applied Waterproofing Systems |
Core Material | PIR (polyisocyanurate) | PIR (polyisocyanurate) |
Facings | Bitumen-faced upper & Mineral-coated glass lowe | Bitumen-faced upper & Mineral-coated glass lowe |
Compressive strength | 150 kPa | 150 kPa |
Thermal Conductivity (λ-value) | 0.024 - 0.027 W/mK, depending on thickness | 0.024 - 0.027 W/mK, depending on thickness |
Typical Board Size | 1200 × 600 mm | 1200 × 600 mm |
Thickness | 30 – 150 mm | 30 – 150 mm |
Cost | Slightly cheaper | More expensive |
There is little to separate the two brands for torch-on systems, as both deliver excellent thermal efficiency and durability.
If you’re looking for the most cost-effective solution, Recticel will be the better choice. However, if cost is less of a concern, and you want an insulation optimised for torch-on membranes, Kingspan TR24 will be the better option.
Criteria | Eurodeck | Kingspan TR26 |
---|---|---|
Application | Mechanically fixed single-ply membranes on flat roofs | Mechanically fixed single-ply membranes on flat roofs |
Core Material | PIR (polyisocyanurate | PIR (polyisocyanurate |
Facings | Aluminium foil on both sides | Aluminium foil on both sides |
Compressive strength | 150 kPa | 150 kPa |
Thermal Conductivity (λ-value) | 0.022 W/mK | 0.022 W/mK |
Typical Board Size | 1200 × 2400 mm | 1200 × 2400 mm |
Thickness | 25-160 mm | 25-160 mm |
Cost | Slightly cheaper | Slightly more expensive |
Both products offer identical facings, thermal conductivity, compressive strength, board size and available thickness; the only difference between the two is cost. Therefore, if you’re operating on a tight budget, Eurodeck will be the better option.
It’s important to note however that insulation is sold in varying thickness, so the Kingspan option may work out cheaper for you depending on your required thickness and total sheets.
Criteria | Powerdeck F | Kingspan TR27 |
---|---|---|
Application | Fully adhered or partially bonded single-ply, liquid or flexible GRP system with carrier membranes. | Fully adhered or partially bonded single-ply, liquid or flexible GRP system with carrier membranes. |
Core Material | PIR (polyisocyanurate | PIR (polyisocyanurate |
Facings | Mineral-coated glass fleece on both sides | Mineral-coated glass fleece on both sides |
Compressive strength | 150 kPa | 150 kPa |
Thermal Conductivity (λ-value) | 0.024 - 0.027 W/mK | 0.024 - 0.027 W/mK |
Typical Board Size | 1200 x 600mm | 1200 × 1200 mm (25mm board = 600mm x 1200mm) |
Thickness | 25 - 150mm | 25 - 150mm |
Cost | Slightly cheaper | Slightly more expensive |
Similar to torch-on and mechanically-fixed systems, both brands are very similar in criteria, sharing the same material composition, thermal conductivity, facings and compressive strength.
That said, they do slightly differ in available sizes, with Kingspan TR27 offering a larger insulation board at 1200mm x 1200mm which is generally more popular (with the 25mm board being an exception at 600mm x 1200mm),whereas the Recticel Powerdeck F is a 600mm x 1200mm as standard. If you are gluing the insulation boards, Recticel Powerdeck F is the more cost-effective solution.
When choosing between Recticel and Kingspan, price is often a big factor — but it shouldn’t be the only one. The system you pick will also influence your long-term running costs, not just the upfront spend.
Upfront costs - Price per Square Meter
Recticel typically ranges from £15-£25/m²
Kingspan typically ranges between £25-£40/m²
Long-term costs
Both Recticel and Kingspan use high-performance PIR insulation, which will significantly help cut heating bills. In some cases, your energy costs will reduce by 50% saving you an average household around £300–£500 a year.
Whilst Recticel is cheaper up-front, when it comes to insulating cavity walls, Kingspan’s phenolic core makes it far more thermally efficient, making it more effective in situations where space is limited.
The choice between Recticel and Kingspan will lie in your priorities and budget.
If you’re on a budget, Recticel is an affordable solution offering great thermal performance. If you’re looking for superior performance, particularly in cavity walls, Kingspan will be the better option as its phenolic core makes it far more thermally efficient.
If you need any help with your insulation project, please don’t hesitate to reach out to us today. UKFR is a family-run business, and with extensive knowledge of insulation and flat roofing, we’re here to help you find what you need for your project.